Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Urszula Radwanska vs Tina Nadine Smith Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Radwanska vs Smith analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
 First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
:Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Urszula Radwanska vs Tina Nadine Smith Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Radwanska 0 - 0 Smith
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Radwanska has won 45.22% of points on their second serve, while Smith has won 49.28%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Radwanska, in recent form, has won 59.2% of their opponent's second serve points, while Smith has won 51.07%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.46% and 39.81% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Radwanska has saved 54.93% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Smith has saved 56.23% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Radwanska has won 54.1% of matches played (W/L 33/ 28), with Smith winning 58.14% (W/L 50/ 36) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Radwanska has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 91/ 61), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 40% (W/L 45/ 67). Smith has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 62% (W/L 8/ 5), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 38/ 38).
- Player level: In the last year, Radwanska has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54.1% of matches (W/L 33/ 28), where as Smith has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.82% of matches (W/L 50/ 35). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Radwanska has played against opponents with an average rank of 198.61 while Smith has played against players with an average rank of 296.48.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Radwanska has won 42% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Smith has won 53% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Radwanska has converted 44.34% of breakpoint opportunities, and Smith has converted 44.85% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
424
Rank
29
High
33
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
328
Rank
325
High
22
Age
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
54% (445-377)
Career Total W/L
56% (145-115)
58% (19-14)
YTD W/L
58% (28-20)
$974,280
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Urszula Radwanska vs Tina Nadine Smith For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Radwanska VS Smith
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit DoubledÂ
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Urszula Radwanska | Tina Nadine Smith |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 58% (19/14) | 58% (28/20) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 61% (47/30) | 58% (65/48) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (373/322) | 53% (552/488) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 43% (3/4) | 56% (10/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 53% (10/9) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 70% (16/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 73% (8/3) |
| Aces pg | 0.12 | 0.21 |
| Aces Total | 41 | 104 |
| DFs per game | 0.18 | 0.29 |
| DFs Total | 61 | 148 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:54:36 | 1:46:20 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 199.18 | 275.69 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (1436/2095) | 61% (1928/3172) |
| 1st Serve W% | 58% (837/1436) | 65% (1261/1928) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (298/659) | 49% (613/1244) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (145/327) | 45% (174/388) |
| Return Pts W% | 48% (1058/2197) | 44% (1406/3189) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 58% (19/14) | 60% (28/19) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 58% (19/33) | 58% (28/48) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 60% (6/10) |
| Deciding Set W% | 18% (2/11) | 47% (8/17) |
| 1st set W, W | 73% (26/19) | 78% (32/25) |
| 1st set W, L | 27% (26/7) | 22% (32/7) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (7/0) | 19% (16/3) |
Urszula Radwanska Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Alexandra Vecic
Player
Urszula Radwanska
74%
(
48 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lanlana Tararudee
Player
Urszula Radwanska
57%
(
54 of
94)
1st Serve %
68%
(
60 of
88)
2
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
0
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
35%
(
14 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
38 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
44 of
88)
100
Total Points Won
82
|
6-1 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alana Parnaby
Player
Urszula Radwanska
53%
(
45 of
85)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
5
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
35%
(
14 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
51%
(
43 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
44 of
70)
86
Total Points Won
69
|
3-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Amelia Rajecki
Player
Urszula Radwanska
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
64%
(
27 of
42)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anastasia Zolotareva
Player
Urszula Radwanska
67%
(
66 of
99)
1st Serve %
63%
(
51 of
81)
1
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
2
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
24%
(
8 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
52%
(
51 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
43 of
81)
91
Total Points Won
89
|
2-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Urszula Radwanska
Player
Iveta Dapkute
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve %
52%
(
40 of
77)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
7
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
44%
(
34 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
42 of
77)
86
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Urszula Radwanska
Player
Aglaya Fedorova
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve %
52%
(
28 of
54)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
10
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daria Kudashova
Player
Urszula Radwanska
52%
(
55 of
105)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
83)
1
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
3
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
50%
(
25 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
48%
(
50 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
41 of
83)
96
Total Points Won
92
|
7-5 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Urszula Radwanska
Player
Evgeniya Burdina
64%
(
63 of
98)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
54%
(
34 of
63)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
46%
(
45 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julie Belgraver
Player
Urszula Radwanska
46%
(
38 of
83)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
85)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
47%
(
9 of
19)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
46%
(
38 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
48 of
85)
93
Total Points Won
75
|
4-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Tina Nadine Smith Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Alexandra Vecic
Player
Tina Nadine Smith
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
91)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
91)
89
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tina Nadine Smith
Player
Jana Bojovic
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tina Nadine Smith
Player
Alana Parnaby
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Carol Zhao
Player
Tina Nadine Smith
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
1
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
0
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tina Nadine Smith
Player
Alice Gillan
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Victoria Mboko
Player
Tina Nadine Smith
54%
(
21 of
39)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
14 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tina Nadine Smith
Player
Sapfo Sakellaridi
70%
(
68 of
97)
1st Serve %
51%
(
47 of
93)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
39%
(
38 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
93)
96
Total Points Won
94
|
7-6(2) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tina Nadine Smith
Player
Jana Bojovic
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Maya Joint
Player
Tina Nadine Smith
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
69%
(
71 of
103)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
33%
(
8 of
24)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
58 of
103)
100
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tina Nadine Smith
Player
Carolina Kuhl
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Radwanska Vs Smith Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Radwanska are available here and Smith photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
